Tampilkan postingan dengan label best 1080p camcorder. Tampilkan semua postingan
Tampilkan postingan dengan label best 1080p camcorder. Tampilkan semua postingan

Minggu, 02 Februari 2014

CHEAPEST 1080p Camcorder?

Q. I need a very cheap (preferably $100 or less) 1080-pixel HD camcorder. I'm into green-screening, so I need a good camcorder. Any suggestions?
Even 720p would work.

A. You would need in excess of $3500 to get a HD camcorder that would have equal Video Quality to a $300 MiniDV camcorder. And a HD consumer level camcorder is a disaster at sporting events..

You can get a Canon ZR 930 for about $300, A camcorder with MiniDV tape as a storage media and Mic jack

I shoot blue screen videos all the time with my Canon ZR cameras


What's up with the cheap 1080p camcorders?
Q. Such as the Kodak playtouch camcorders, why would someone buy a canon vixia instead for around 800 bucks?

A. 1080p is 1080p. Just because is something is 1080p doesn't mean it will look good, all it means is that it will be in HD. Even though HD is high quality doesn't mean it will look good. Image quality has a lot to do with how a camera lens picks up and processes (sensors) light. The Canon Vixia is more expensive because you have more control of your picture. The Canon Vixia will pick up and process light better and you will also have more control, like being able to adjust focus and white balance etc...
It may be expensive but with video you do get what you pay for.





Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Sabtu, 01 Februari 2014

Best buget camera or camcorder for Full HD 1080P/I Videos ?

Q. In my work i need to make people profile as clicking pics as well as recording full HD Video.(indoor).

Currently I am using Sony DSC H50 for clicking Full HD 1080P images but for making Full HD 1080P/I Videos i am looking for budget camera or camcorder.

If any one can help me to find best buget camera or camcorder for Full HD 1080P/I Videos ?

A. Getting a HD camcorder is taking a step backward in Video Quality. HD camcorders Interpolate the video, which means of every 25 frames of video, 4 or 5 frames are taken by the lens assembly, the other frames in between these are filled in by the camcorder inner circuitry, thus giving you not true video. HD camcorders interpolate the video, which means of every 25 frames of video, 4 or 5 frames are taken by the lens assembly; the other frames in between these are filled in by the camcorder inner circuitry, thus giving you not true video. It looks like this -one frame from the lens assembly, 7or 8 from the electronic circuitry, one frame from the lens assembly, 7or 8 from the electronic circuitry, one frame from the lens assembly, 7or 8 from the electronic circuitry, one frame from the lens assembly, 7or 8 from the electronic circuitry, from front to back of the video. Near impossible to edit, even when you have the Multi processor computer with the big Graphics and sound cards that is required to edit, view, watch and work with the files a HD camcorder produces.

http://simplevideoediting.com/learn/part1_camcorder_choices.htm

http://simplevideoediting.com/learn/part2_connect_camcorder.htm

Consumer level HD camcorders have 4 problems. 1) Blurry, fuzzy, out of focus areas closely around people in videos taken by consumer level HD camcorders. 2) Any movement, even a wave or lifting an arm, while in front of a recording consumer level HD camcorder, results in screen ghosts and artifacts being left on the video track, following the movement. Makes for bad video, sports videos are unwatchable. 3) These Consumer level HD camcorders all have a habit of the transferred to computer files are something you need to convert, thus losing your HD quality, to work with your editing software. 4) Mandatory maximum record times - 1 hour, 30 minutes, 8 minutes, 3 minutes � four different times advertised as maximum record time for some consumer level HD camcorders. No event I have ever been to is that short. Either take multiple camcorders or pack up with out getting the end of the event on video.

MiniDV is currently the most popular format for consumer digital camcorders. MiniDV camcorders are typically more affordable than their HDD and DVD counterparts. Each MiniDV tape will typically hold an hour of footage at normal recording speed and quality. MiniDV tapes are available for purchase at not only electronic and camera stores, but also at drugs stores and grocery stores, making them easy to find while your on vacation. There are literally hundreds of MiniDV camcorders available; both in standard and high-definition. And add the fact that to get a HD camcorder that could produce better video quality footage, one would have to spend in excess of $3500 for that camcorder that could produce higher quality video.

http://www.canon.ca/inetCA/products?m=gp&pid=1017#_030


1080p dSLR vs. Camcorder?
Q. I want to be able to shoot video with something that has an interchangeable lens. The Sony Handycam starts at $1,999 and I have ~$500. I want it to be 1080p, be able to change lens (preferably) so I can do fish eye and wide angle etc... while snowboarding, and about $500.
Should I be looking at DLSRs or video cameras? What model/make, anything?

Cheers,
Mason

A. Just because the camcorder does not have "interchangeable lenses" does not mean you cannot ADD a lens to the camcorder. Any camcorder with the specification "Lens filter diameter" has a thread mount surrounding the lens which allows adding a screw-mount lens.

For example, the Sony HDR-HC9 and HDR-CX500 have a lens filter diameter spec and you can add tele, wide angle and fisheye lenses to them. And they are about 1/2 the cost of the NEX-VG10.

Since you are planning to do fast action stuff (snowboarding), it would be best if the video storage format was less than what AVCHD compression applies into MTS (or TOD) files.

Your task is to identify the camcorders in the $300-400 range that have the "Lens filter diameter" spec. This is basically the upper end of the consumer entry-level range of camcorders. The reason you are starting at the $300-400 range is beause after you get the camcorder, then you need to buy the add-on lens. If the camcorder has a 30mm lens filter diameter, then search for a fisheye by using "30mm fisheye".

Chances are VERY high you will not find what you are looking for... but at least you know, now, how to look for what is in your budget.

A decent dSLR will be in the same boat... the good ones with interchangeable lens mounts won't allow you any $ for additional lenses. You would be better off getting a stock lens and using your video editor to add the fisheye effect.





Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Sabtu, 09 November 2013

What is a good small HD camcorder with a built in light?

Q. I am looking for an inexpensive high def (720p is okay) hard drive camcorder with a built in light for low light situations. I already have a nice Sony 1080p camcorder, but I would like a less expensive simple camcorder for more every day type of events. I have heard good things about Flip but none of theirs have a light.

Are there any with a light? Any suggestions?

A. JVC


In a Camcorder, what exactally does a Megapixle refer to?
Q. I have been working with my 4.0 MP Sony camcorder for a while, but I never understood what exactly is a Megapixel refers to. Is it the number of pixels in a frame? Does it affect the resolution in any way? (My camcorder is a 1080P camcorder) What about quality does it affect?

A. There is an imaging chip in the camera. The imaging chip is made of silicon (among other things). On the imaging chip are pixels. One pixel is the smallest "controllable" point on the imaging chip and basically is that starting point of where the image through the lens is turned into digital information (basically a series of zeroes and ones that indicate whether a pixel should be on or off.

A megapixel is 1 million pixels. Your 4 megapixel camera has 4 million pixels. This is how still image resolution is measured. Other items are used to determine quality - including the amount and type of data compression used.

Video is measured differently. Horizontal row count is the primary method to determine video resolution. The common horizontal row counts are 480 for standard definition, 720 and 1080 for high definition. The amount and type of compression play a huge role.

In either case, lots of data compression means discarding the data and reducing the quality of the image. But there is a benefit to smaller file sizes.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pixel
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Megapixel#Megapixel

Because video standards are different from still image standards, the imaging chip is used differently. An increase in (still image) megapixel count does not translate into an increase in video resolution.

As previously indicated, the common horizontal line counts for video are 480, 720 and 1080. Because of the way video is required to display, using aspect ratio and needing to be used on televisions and over various broadcast methods, the vertical columns can be used to arrive at the "pixel count".

640x480=307,200 (or about 1/3 megapixel)
1280x720=921,600 (or almost a megapixel)
1920x1080=2,073,600 (or about 2 megapixels)

There are lots more video standard sizes, but they are more computer monitor related rather than broadcast TV related.

So yes, the megapixels are whats on the chip which makes up the pixel count in the digital still image.





Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Kamis, 19 September 2013

What camera should I use for solid HD video?

Q. Right now, I have a Sony a350 dSLR and a Sony SR-7 1080p camcorder.

I really don't take photos that often, but when I do they have to be good. Same goes for video, and right now, the little Sony is not doing the job.

I'm looking to get a video camera that does outstanding video, but doesn't leave me broke. I'm considering selling both of the cams I currently have and just using 1 that does both.

I'd rather not use AVCHD either... too hard to edit.

A. For "solid HD video" use of a video capture device that does not use a high compression to process/store and lots of light during capture are your best bets.

The Sony HDR-SR7 was one of the early AVCHD cams (2007, I think). Between the high compression AVCHD and smallish (37mm) lens filter diameter, I'm not too surprised that you are not happy with the results. In my opinion, a larger lens diameter and 3CCD or 3CMOS imaging chip will provide a vast improvement when coupled with lots of light and less compression.

Here's the problem: Low compression, high definition video, in a 3-chip camera with a large lens diameter starts at the prosumer Sony HDR-FX1000. HDV format onto miniDV tape or an external flash memory recording device (over firewire). $4,000.

Since we don't know what computer or editing application you are using, it is challenging to understand how we can get you to an easier editing place. AVCHD does not have to be difficult to edit if the video capture is done with tools designed to do the job.

If we bail from the HDR-FX1000 and stay in consumer grade, I do like the Canon HF S series. I don't know if that is still too much $. But assuming we can get an AVCHD-capable editor, it should be easier to edit + a larger lens diameter (58mm) than the SR7, decent sized single imaging chip and lower compression than the older AVCHD system...

Camcorders are designed to capture good video and audio. Their ability to take stills is a convenience feature. Cameras and dSLRs are designed to take stills. They can capture great video and audio - but there are challenges when dealing with this "convenience feature". I have not yet seen the single device that can do both well.


What camera would be best for shooting an independent film on a budget?
Q. I have a budget of about $1000 for a camera, light, and possible editing program. I've been looking around for the best deal and I've found a few but I would like to know the best deal on an HD 1080p camcorder and/or camera that shoots video for shooting an independent film...

A. do what HANNA said to do
make a list side by side
so you can match and see which has which and then you can decide that way


good luck
smile





Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Sabtu, 27 Juli 2013

What camera should I use for solid HD video?

Q. Right now, I have a Sony a350 dSLR and a Sony SR-7 1080p camcorder.

I really don't take photos that often, but when I do they have to be good. Same goes for video, and right now, the little Sony is not doing the job.

I'm looking to get a video camera that does outstanding video, but doesn't leave me broke. I'm considering selling both of the cams I currently have and just using 1 that does both.

I'd rather not use AVCHD either... too hard to edit.

A. For "solid HD video" use of a video capture device that does not use a high compression to process/store and lots of light during capture are your best bets.

The Sony HDR-SR7 was one of the early AVCHD cams (2007, I think). Between the high compression AVCHD and smallish (37mm) lens filter diameter, I'm not too surprised that you are not happy with the results. In my opinion, a larger lens diameter and 3CCD or 3CMOS imaging chip will provide a vast improvement when coupled with lots of light and less compression.

Here's the problem: Low compression, high definition video, in a 3-chip camera with a large lens diameter starts at the prosumer Sony HDR-FX1000. HDV format onto miniDV tape or an external flash memory recording device (over firewire). $4,000.

Since we don't know what computer or editing application you are using, it is challenging to understand how we can get you to an easier editing place. AVCHD does not have to be difficult to edit if the video capture is done with tools designed to do the job.

If we bail from the HDR-FX1000 and stay in consumer grade, I do like the Canon HF S series. I don't know if that is still too much $. But assuming we can get an AVCHD-capable editor, it should be easier to edit + a larger lens diameter (58mm) than the SR7, decent sized single imaging chip and lower compression than the older AVCHD system...

Camcorders are designed to capture good video and audio. Their ability to take stills is a convenience feature. Cameras and dSLRs are designed to take stills. They can capture great video and audio - but there are challenges when dealing with this "convenience feature". I have not yet seen the single device that can do both well.


What camera would be best for shooting an independent film on a budget?
Q. I have a budget of about $1000 for a camera, light, and possible editing program. I've been looking around for the best deal and I've found a few but I would like to know the best deal on an HD 1080p camcorder and/or camera that shoots video for shooting an independent film...

A. do what HANNA said to do
make a list side by side
so you can match and see which has which and then you can decide that way


good luck
smile





Powered by Yahoo! Answers