Q. When i was watching FIFA world cup italia 1990. I was watching it live on tv... i remember the quality of the matches was 100% brilliant live.. like todays quality live match images on tv. I remember that. But in 1994 fifa world up usa.. the quality was still good but it looked more snowy and more ghosty then previewsly in 1990. Im in australia so not sure why the quality was less quality in 1994 when 1990 was very brilliant quality on at the time.
Okies QUESTIONS: When i was watching fifa world up on tv in 1990. notice there was a guy in his business clothes filming a match close to the field which looked like it was a movie camera a round shape camera looked like a old filming camera shape in his shoulder...
My question is... why on earth would someone at the field film a match on film rather then virtually a normal profetional camera that uses TAPE rather then roll films like the old days ?
What was it for... was he just doing a documentry meant mainly for a documentry about fifa world up and had to be film in roll film camera ? I don't understand why.. since old film cameras would make a playback image look like a movie or not so clear viewing as in tapes.
I remember watching north korea this year the dearth of the piggy who the guys where filming the ceremony like old roll film cameras.. you can exactly see the type of cameras.. again thats 2012... why would they use these types of cameras when there is profetional camcorder cameras that does more clear and brilliant picture then old days films ?
I wonder if its been used yet other countrys for live events.... not sure why they use something that wont make the image super clean... roll film filming means the image your just recorded aventually will have scratches all over the documentry making it out as if the stuff you just film was a 1940s film era.
Love to know this.. could you be kind to explain it all to me? im very interested about this. thanks very much.
Okies QUESTIONS: When i was watching fifa world up on tv in 1990. notice there was a guy in his business clothes filming a match close to the field which looked like it was a movie camera a round shape camera looked like a old filming camera shape in his shoulder...
My question is... why on earth would someone at the field film a match on film rather then virtually a normal profetional camera that uses TAPE rather then roll films like the old days ?
What was it for... was he just doing a documentry meant mainly for a documentry about fifa world up and had to be film in roll film camera ? I don't understand why.. since old film cameras would make a playback image look like a movie or not so clear viewing as in tapes.
I remember watching north korea this year the dearth of the piggy who the guys where filming the ceremony like old roll film cameras.. you can exactly see the type of cameras.. again thats 2012... why would they use these types of cameras when there is profetional camcorder cameras that does more clear and brilliant picture then old days films ?
I wonder if its been used yet other countrys for live events.... not sure why they use something that wont make the image super clean... roll film filming means the image your just recorded aventually will have scratches all over the documentry making it out as if the stuff you just film was a 1940s film era.
Love to know this.. could you be kind to explain it all to me? im very interested about this. thanks very much.
A. Hi again, Mofina:
Part of your Question asks about equipment used 22 years ago, and a lot of technological advancements in portable camcorders have been made since then, although film cameras haven't changed very much in that time period.
But just like with American football matches and the NFL Films documentary team, many camera crews that don't need to broadcast "live" prefer to work with film rather than videotape for many reasons. And when it comes to international event coverage, using film eliminates the worry about the various television broadcast formats that exist (and are quite different!) from country to country. (With modern camcorders, this is why the "24p" cinema-emulation frame-rate setting is becoming more popular rather than having to choose between North American/Japan 30/60fps and European 25/50fps settings.)
Contrary to what you might think, brand new film footage can have a better image quality (both in resolution and contrast rendering) than your average news & sports camcorder. And unlike in the 1940s, the original footage is usually scanned (electronically) or an intermediate negative (called a CRI or "interneg") is made so the original remains pristine & unscratched. Plus, film stock chemistry has greatly improved since the World War II era. You'd be surprised at the number of Hollywood-quality films that have been made using modern 16mm color film stock and camera/lens combinations.
And finally, when it comes to fast-action sports like soccer/football, it's simpler and less-costly to use fast-shutter speeds (to eliminate blurring in single frames) or higher frame rates (for extreme slow-motion capture) with a mechanical film camera than with an electronic camcorder.
It all boils down to selecting the right tool for the job, and which tools or media that work best for the project.
And as I mentioned in my earlier Answer to your Y!A Question about microphones used at FIFA matches, sometimes older technology is more reliable than the newest stuff.
hope this helps,
--Dennis C.
Part of your Question asks about equipment used 22 years ago, and a lot of technological advancements in portable camcorders have been made since then, although film cameras haven't changed very much in that time period.
But just like with American football matches and the NFL Films documentary team, many camera crews that don't need to broadcast "live" prefer to work with film rather than videotape for many reasons. And when it comes to international event coverage, using film eliminates the worry about the various television broadcast formats that exist (and are quite different!) from country to country. (With modern camcorders, this is why the "24p" cinema-emulation frame-rate setting is becoming more popular rather than having to choose between North American/Japan 30/60fps and European 25/50fps settings.)
Contrary to what you might think, brand new film footage can have a better image quality (both in resolution and contrast rendering) than your average news & sports camcorder. And unlike in the 1940s, the original footage is usually scanned (electronically) or an intermediate negative (called a CRI or "interneg") is made so the original remains pristine & unscratched. Plus, film stock chemistry has greatly improved since the World War II era. You'd be surprised at the number of Hollywood-quality films that have been made using modern 16mm color film stock and camera/lens combinations.
And finally, when it comes to fast-action sports like soccer/football, it's simpler and less-costly to use fast-shutter speeds (to eliminate blurring in single frames) or higher frame rates (for extreme slow-motion capture) with a mechanical film camera than with an electronic camcorder.
It all boils down to selecting the right tool for the job, and which tools or media that work best for the project.
And as I mentioned in my earlier Answer to your Y!A Question about microphones used at FIFA matches, sometimes older technology is more reliable than the newest stuff.
hope this helps,
--Dennis C.
In a area with much more squirrels then rabbits would a squirrel call work better for predators?
Q. For the second time this week I just witnessed a gray fox eating a squirrel and it was the coolest thing ever because I was able to watch from my kitchen. For the longest time I have been trying to get some good video of them for my youtube channel (channels partnered so its like a fun job) and I think now would be the best time due to the fact I have seen 4 red foxes and 2 or more gray foxes along with one lone coyote in just two weeks alone and thats a all time high. Anyway just a month or two ago I had probably about 30 squirrels eating corn from the food pile I put out and no rabbits. I have only seen like 20 rabbits in all of 2012. So wouldnt a squirrel call be better or do squirrels not make squeels?
Dan I know you probably know 100 times more then me but in only a 100 acre area wouldnt only one call be better then a whole wounded bird/rodent party? Sounds pretty suspicous to animals I bet.
Dan I know you probably know 100 times more then me but in only a 100 acre area wouldnt only one call be better then a whole wounded bird/rodent party? Sounds pretty suspicous to animals I bet.
A. Andrew:
All predators know the sound of an injured rabbit. All predators know the sound of an injured squirrel. In fact, the sound of just about ANY injured critter in the wild gets the attention of fox and coyotes, as well as any other critter that prefers a diet of meat. However, keep in mind that squirrels often retreat to the trees where the four-legged varmints can't get to them. Only the hawks and owls. All though the raptors make great video subjects, most predator hunters do not want them coming to the call. "IF" you invest in a quality calling system such as Fox Pro or one of a half a dozen other good brands of electronic callers, you can also equip yourself with a good variety of prerecorded calls on disc, tape, or memory card besides the sounds of injured rabbit and squirrel. I have three different electronics which offer me a selection that includes distress calls of fawn deer, cub bears, fox & coyote pups, bobcat/lynx kittens, woodpecker, wood rat, crows/ravens, waterfowl, two kinds of rabbits, etc. Even with all of that and more to choose from and three QUALITY electronics systems to choose from and play those sounds as well, I STILL carry my reed call because over the 40+ years I have hunted the predators, I have learned how to make it work, and work well. It talks a language that EVERY predator I would ever hunt FULLY understands. "RABBIT!" Just remember that with the animals that close to you, you do NOT want to over-blow or over-work the call. Also remember a VERY important point that a LOT of beginning callers don't often think about. Rabbits have a LOT smaller lungs than you do. Keep your calls down to shorter bursts and runs. Don't make L-O-N-G and drawn out calls or series of calls. If the varmints are as close to your neighborhood as you say, you should have them in your lap within minutes. If you haven't seen them within 15 minutes up to a half hour, max, either you've done something wrong and they've seen you or heard something about your call they didn't like, OR they just aren't there. This is one of those times when practice really does make perfect. But do NOT practice outside with the fox and coyotes. They learn quicker than we do and the smarter they get from our mistakes, the harder they will be to coax in to your call, regardless of WHAT kind of call you use. Good luck. (IMPORTANT TIP: Keep the battery for your camcorder FULLY charged. Remember they do not work as well or as long in COLD weather. It's even a good idea sometimes to carry the battery in your warm pocket until you are ready to use it. It's ALWAYS good to carry an extra fully charged spare or two.)
ANDREW: You don't EVER play them all as in your so-called "rodent party". You have a remote option to choose ONLY the call or two that best fits the occasion. In your case, I'd place my remote speaker about 40 or 50 yards away from where I set up the camera and then use the remote selector and volume control to pied-piper one in. At most, I have NEVER used more than three calls at any one session. I might start with the jackrabbit fairly loud and then go to a quiter version of the cottontail rabbit and finish up with the final coaxing call of a mouse or wood rat squeaking. It works. It's not rocket science here, just common sense and logic. And when you use the good quality products rather than a cellphone, trust me on this, the predators RARELY think it "sounds pretty suspicious". And that's something you CAN bet on.
All predators know the sound of an injured rabbit. All predators know the sound of an injured squirrel. In fact, the sound of just about ANY injured critter in the wild gets the attention of fox and coyotes, as well as any other critter that prefers a diet of meat. However, keep in mind that squirrels often retreat to the trees where the four-legged varmints can't get to them. Only the hawks and owls. All though the raptors make great video subjects, most predator hunters do not want them coming to the call. "IF" you invest in a quality calling system such as Fox Pro or one of a half a dozen other good brands of electronic callers, you can also equip yourself with a good variety of prerecorded calls on disc, tape, or memory card besides the sounds of injured rabbit and squirrel. I have three different electronics which offer me a selection that includes distress calls of fawn deer, cub bears, fox & coyote pups, bobcat/lynx kittens, woodpecker, wood rat, crows/ravens, waterfowl, two kinds of rabbits, etc. Even with all of that and more to choose from and three QUALITY electronics systems to choose from and play those sounds as well, I STILL carry my reed call because over the 40+ years I have hunted the predators, I have learned how to make it work, and work well. It talks a language that EVERY predator I would ever hunt FULLY understands. "RABBIT!" Just remember that with the animals that close to you, you do NOT want to over-blow or over-work the call. Also remember a VERY important point that a LOT of beginning callers don't often think about. Rabbits have a LOT smaller lungs than you do. Keep your calls down to shorter bursts and runs. Don't make L-O-N-G and drawn out calls or series of calls. If the varmints are as close to your neighborhood as you say, you should have them in your lap within minutes. If you haven't seen them within 15 minutes up to a half hour, max, either you've done something wrong and they've seen you or heard something about your call they didn't like, OR they just aren't there. This is one of those times when practice really does make perfect. But do NOT practice outside with the fox and coyotes. They learn quicker than we do and the smarter they get from our mistakes, the harder they will be to coax in to your call, regardless of WHAT kind of call you use. Good luck. (IMPORTANT TIP: Keep the battery for your camcorder FULLY charged. Remember they do not work as well or as long in COLD weather. It's even a good idea sometimes to carry the battery in your warm pocket until you are ready to use it. It's ALWAYS good to carry an extra fully charged spare or two.)
ANDREW: You don't EVER play them all as in your so-called "rodent party". You have a remote option to choose ONLY the call or two that best fits the occasion. In your case, I'd place my remote speaker about 40 or 50 yards away from where I set up the camera and then use the remote selector and volume control to pied-piper one in. At most, I have NEVER used more than three calls at any one session. I might start with the jackrabbit fairly loud and then go to a quiter version of the cottontail rabbit and finish up with the final coaxing call of a mouse or wood rat squeaking. It works. It's not rocket science here, just common sense and logic. And when you use the good quality products rather than a cellphone, trust me on this, the predators RARELY think it "sounds pretty suspicious". And that's something you CAN bet on.
Powered by Yahoo! Answers
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar